Aidan Kim vs Ryuki Matsuda Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Sep at 06:48 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Kim vs R. Matsuda

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kim 1 - 0 Matsuda
They have played 2 sets in total, with Aidan Kim winning 2 and Ryuki Matsuda winning 0. The last match between Aidan Kim and Ryuki Matsuda was at the Winston-Salem Challenger, 09-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Aidan Kim getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kim | 1 |
| Matsuda | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Winston-Salem Challenger(09-09-25)
A. Kim vs R. Matsuda H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.41% (66-47) | Career Total W/L | 54.92% (162-133) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Kim vs R. Matsuda Match Preview:
- How do Kim and Matsuda compare on second serve performance? Both have nearly identical success, with Kim at 43% and Matsuda at 43.17% over the past 6 months.
- In returning opponents' second serves, Kim edges out Matsuda slightly, winning 48.26% compared to Matsuda's 46.24%.
- Conversely, Matsuda excels in first serve returns, capturing 30.39% of points compared to Kim's 25.32%.
- Under pressure, Matsuda shows resilience by saving 52.56% of breakpoints, while Kim saves 48.98%.
- Performance-wise over the last year, Kim leads with an impressive 68.97% win rate, surpassing Matsuda's 53.03%.
- Both players perform best on hard courts, but Kim holds a slight advantage with a 62% win rate compared to Matsuda's 58%.
- In tournament level play, Kim's 76% victory rate in lower-level events outshines Matsuda's 58.33% in similar competitions.
- Kim also faces tougher competition, with opponents averaging a ranking of 384.79, while Matsuda's opponents average 432.44.
- In deciding sets, Matsuda demonstrates strong nerve, winning 64% versus Kim's 40% over the past year.
- Kim converts break points more effectively at 40.63%, ahead of Matsuda's 37.91%.
Editorial Prediction (September 8, 2025, UTC):
As we compare Kim and Matsuda's recent performances, a clear pattern emerges. Both players show near parity in second serve success, but Kim holds the edge in returning second serves. Matsuda, meanwhile, excels in returning first serves and under pressure situations, such as saving break points.
Over the past year, Kim has been consistently outperforming Matsuda in terms of match wins and has faced higher-ranked opponents. On hard surfaces, both players excel, though Kim's win rate is slightly superior. Additionally, Kim's greater breakpoint conversion suggests a subtle advantage in capitalizing on key moments.
Matsuda's notable strength is closing out deciding sets, indicating a high degree of mental toughness during critical junctures. However, overall consistency and performance against tougher competition give Kim the edge.
While Matsuda's ability to perform under pressure should not be underestimated, Kim appears to be the likely victor in this upcoming tennis match, based on their comprehensive performance advantages.
Aidan Kim vs Ryuki Matsuda Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Kim vs R. Matsuda H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:13:33 | Average Match Time | 1:13:33 |
| 60% (31/52) | 1st Serve % | 60% (29/48) |
| 71% (22/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (16/29) |
| 52% (11/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (8/19) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (3/6) |
| 50% (24/48) | Return Points Win % | 37% (19/52) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Kim Recent Matches Played
R. Matsuda Recent Matches Played

A. Kim vs R. Matsuda Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.41% (66/47) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.92% (162/133) |
| 57.89% (154/112) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.49% (360/313) |
| 52.56% (1336/1206) | Games Win/Loss | 52.04% (3207/2956) |
| 62.71% (37/22) | Hard Win/Loss | 57.30% (157/117) |
| 56.67% (17/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 28.57% (4/10) |
| 52.17% (12/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 485 | Aces Total | 362 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 284 | Total Double Faults | 363 |
| 1:35:16 | Average Match Time | 1:31:37 |
| 454.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 454.63 |
| 63% (4405/7031) | 1st Serve % | 65% (10521/16254) |
| 68% (3003/4405) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (6626/10521) |
| 50% (1311/2626) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2892/5733) |
| 43% (308/720) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (796/1792) |
| 41% (2824/6960) | Return Points Win % | 42% (6959/16603) |
| 27.27% (3/8) | Challenger W/L | 38.60% (22/35) |
| 61.76% (63/39) | Futures W/L | 58.82% (140/98) |
| 59% (66/111) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (158/291) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 64% (18/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (34/66) |
| 50% (19/38) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (46/85) |
| 86% (66/57) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (158/138) |
| 14% (66/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (158/20) |
| 21% (47/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (137/23) |